<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for gingerandjohn.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gingerandjohn.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gingerandjohn.com</link>
	<description>Removing all doubt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:16:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on links for 2010-03-11 by Melinda Weathers</title>
		<link>http://www.gingerandjohn.com/archives/2010/03/11/links-for-2010-03-11/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Melinda Weathers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gingerandjohn.com/archives/2010/03/11/links-for-2010-03-11/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Cool, but have you tried Ruby?  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool, but have you tried Ruby?  <img src='http://www.gingerandjohn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on cx_Oracle executemany() Example by TTimo</title>
		<link>http://www.gingerandjohn.com/archives/2004/02/26/cx_oracle-executemany-example/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>TTimo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 22:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gingerandjohn.com/archives/2004/02/26/cx_oracle-executemany-example/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>unfortunately executemany doesn&#039;t support queries, only operations like inserts (as of 5.0.2)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>unfortunately executemany doesn't support queries, only operations like inserts (as of 5.0.2)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I am a geek ubergod by Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.gingerandjohn.com/archives/2009/01/05/i-am-a-geek-ubergod/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gingerandjohn.com/?p=158#comment-28</guid>
		<description>An interesting dynamic programming problem. I think I&#039;ve heard you and Melinda mentioning Project Euler, but I never checked it out until I saw this post. And then, of course, I had to solve the problem...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting dynamic programming problem. I think I've heard you and Melinda mentioning Project Euler, but I never checked it out until I saw this post. And then, of course, I had to solve the problem...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on links for 2009-01-07 by Melinda Weathers</title>
		<link>http://www.gingerandjohn.com/archives/2009/01/07/links-for-2009-01-07/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Melinda Weathers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 01:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gingerandjohn.com/archives/2009/01/07/links-for-2009-01-07/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>I got 14 out of 15 right on the logic test too, but I disagree with the answer on the one I got wrong.  This is the question:

--------
Question 15. 
a) Water is a molecule composed of two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom.
b) Every observation or examination by microscope has confirmed this.

Conclusion
Therefore we can predict that every future examination of water will reveal the same chemical composition.
-----

I say that this conclusion is *valid* since by item (a), Water is composed of two hydrogen atoms and an oxygen atom.  So therefore every time we examine it, this is what it will be.  If it isn&#039;t, then either we weren&#039;t examining water, or item (a) is false.  However, the site says the answer is invalid.  Bleh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got 14 out of 15 right on the logic test too, but I disagree with the answer on the one I got wrong.  This is the question:</p>
<p>--------<br />
Question 15. <br />
a) Water is a molecule composed of two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom.<br />
b) Every observation or examination by microscope has confirmed this.</p>
<p>Conclusion<br />
Therefore we can predict that every future examination of water will reveal the same chemical composition.<br />
-----</p>
<p>I say that this conclusion is <strong>valid</strong> since by item (a), Water is composed of two hydrogen atoms and an oxygen atom.  So therefore every time we examine it, this is what it will be.  If it isn't, then either we weren't examining water, or item (a) is false.  However, the site says the answer is invalid.  Bleh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Two by John C</title>
		<link>http://www.gingerandjohn.com/archives/2008/03/28/two/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>John C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 12:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gingerandjohn.com/archives/2008/03/28/two/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>test comment - do i get it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>test comment - do i get it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Giant&#8217;s Ring by Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.gingerandjohn.com/archives/2007/09/25/the-giants-ring/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 03:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gingerandjohn.com/archives/2007/09/25/the-giants-ring/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Now that you&#039;ve been stung by a nettle, you have to eat one! Seriously, I hear nettle soup is pretty popular over there (at least in England, not sure about the rest of UK), and it sounds like it would be pretty good - no stinging.

Don&#039;t forget to post about your trip to Dunfanaghy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that you've been stung by a nettle, you have to eat one! Seriously, I hear nettle soup is pretty popular over there (at least in England, not sure about the rest of UK), and it sounds like it would be pretty good - no stinging.</p>
<p>Don't forget to post about your trip to Dunfanaghy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The first weekend excursion, part 2: Larne and Ballygalley by Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.gingerandjohn.com/archives/2007/09/05/the-first-weekend-excursion-part-2-larne-and-ballygalley/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 03:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gingerandjohn.com/archives/2007/09/05/the-first-weekend-excursion-part-2-larne-and-ballygalley/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>I liked the pictures - gorgeous country. My folks were in Northern Ireland and Scotland for two weeks, and they just returned about a week and a half ago. Today they were in town, and they showed me some of their pictures. If you haven&#039;t already (which you may have since I&#039;m reading this post about a month late and haven&#039;t caught up to the latest post - reading oldest to newest), you should get some shots of the giant&#039;s causeway. I was shown pictures on a camera-phone, so it wasn&#039;t quite the level of detail I was hoping for. I hear another reason to go see the causeway is because it is quite close to the Bushmill&#039;s distillery.

Also, thanks for putting the link to my site - I probably wouldn&#039;t have found your site otherwise (it never occurs to me to ask you in an e-mail - last time I tried I attempted &quot;johnandginger.com&quot; because I knew it was something like that, but I never thought to reverse it - and then I saw it in the Incoming Links section of my Wordpress dashboard).

Talk to you on Monday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked the pictures - gorgeous country. My folks were in Northern Ireland and Scotland for two weeks, and they just returned about a week and a half ago. Today they were in town, and they showed me some of their pictures. If you haven't already (which you may have since I'm reading this post about a month late and haven't caught up to the latest post - reading oldest to newest), you should get some shots of the giant's causeway. I was shown pictures on a camera-phone, so it wasn't quite the level of detail I was hoping for. I hear another reason to go see the causeway is because it is quite close to the Bushmill's distillery.</p>
<p>Also, thanks for putting the link to my site - I probably wouldn't have found your site otherwise (it never occurs to me to ask you in an e-mail - last time I tried I attempted "johnandginger.com" because I knew it was something like that, but I never thought to reverse it - and then I saw it in the Incoming Links section of my Wordpress dashboard).</p>
<p>Talk to you on Monday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MT 3.0, cost, price, and goodwill by gingerandjohn.com &#187; Same car, new engine</title>
		<link>http://www.gingerandjohn.com/archives/2004/05/16/mt-30-cost-price-and-goodwill/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>gingerandjohn.com &#187; Same car, new engine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gingerandjohn.com/archives/2004/05/16/mt-30-cost-price-and-goodwill/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>[...] m      	       	       		This site now runs on WordPress. As I&#8217;ve discussed here and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gingerandjohn.com/archives/2004/05/16/mt-30-cost-price-and-goodwill/&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, I am uncomfortable with MT&#8217;s new licensing terms. I w [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] m      	       	       		This site now runs on WordPress. As I&#8217;ve discussed here and <a href="http://www.gingerandjohn.com/archives/2004/05/16/mt-30-cost-price-and-goodwill/">here</a>, I am uncomfortable with MT&#8217;s new licensing terms. I w [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MT goes 3.0, SixApart goes &#8220;Oops&#8221; by gingerandjohn.com &#187; Same car, new engine</title>
		<link>http://www.gingerandjohn.com/archives/2004/05/16/mt-goes-30-sixapart-goes-oops/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>gingerandjohn.com &#187; Same car, new engine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gingerandjohn.com/archives/2004/05/16/mt-goes-30-sixapart-goes-oops/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>[...] @ 9:01 am      	       	       		This site now runs on WordPress. As I&#8217;ve discussed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gingerandjohn.com/archives/2004/05/16/mt-goes-30-sixapart-goes-oops/&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and here, I am uncomfortable with MT&#8217;s new licensing t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] @ 9:01 am      	       	       		This site now runs on WordPress. As I&#8217;ve discussed <a href="http://www.gingerandjohn.com/archives/2004/05/16/mt-goes-30-sixapart-goes-oops/">here</a> and here, I am uncomfortable with MT&#8217;s new licensing t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Surf&#8217;s up by gingerandjohn.com &#187; More on Flight 327</title>
		<link>http://www.gingerandjohn.com/archives/2004/08/13/surfs-up/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>gingerandjohn.com &#187; More on Flight 327</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gingerandjohn.com/archives/2004/08/13/surfs-up/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>[...] expand a little more about the &#8220;Terror in the Skies: Again?&#8221; link I mentioned &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gingerandjohn.com/archives/2004/08/13/surfs-up/&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. I did read the article again, and it was even more chilling the second time arou [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] expand a little more about the &#8220;Terror in the Skies: Again?&#8221; link I mentioned <a href="http://www.gingerandjohn.com/archives/2004/08/13/surfs-up/">here</a>. I did read the article again, and it was even more chilling the second time arou [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
